Comité des Utilisateurs de l'Observatoire National des Risques Naturels

Participant’s information
Family name/first name
Gerard François
Email address
Host institution during the project
AFPCN
Area of expertise / professional role / SIM code
Science
Please specify
Universities / research institutes
Level of involvement in the action
Direct involvement
Date of the questionnaire entry
31/03/2017
Source of your information
Professional experience
Basic information about the action
Title of the action
Comité des Utilisateurs de l'Observatoire National des Risques Naturels
Acronym of the action
CU-ONRN
Are you evaluating an action in its entirety or only a specific sub-section?
Entire action
Starting date (real or provisional)
No foreseeable starting date
End date (real or provisional)
No end date specified
Espresso's Challenge concerned
Disaster Risk Reduction
Thematic context of the action
Education/information/communication/outreach
Governance/public infrastructure
Scientific research/data acquisition
Policy/legislation/regulation
Description of the action
Faire le lien entre l'Observatoire et la communauté des parties prenantes de la gestion des risques naturels
State of progress of the action
Ongoing
Territories concerned by the action
France
Spatial scale of the action
National scale
Type(s) of hazards concerned by the action
Other
Please specify
Multi-aléas de tous types
In which language(s) have the action-related documents been formulated?
French
Risk evaluation and understanding (Average : 4.33)
Please evaluate the action's influence on transparency and public access to non-sensitive natural risk and/or climate change data
5 : very strong impact
Is the action able to federate different fields of expertise?
4 : strong ability
Does the action contribute to create, enrich or improve data contents?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Does the action have an impact on local risk culture or risk memory among the population?
4 : strong impact
Optimising governance (Average : 4)
Does the action contribute to integrating scientific research into public policy or decision making process?
4 : strong contribution
Please evaluate the action's impact on improving the coordinated cooperation between various institutions/organizations from DRR and CCA?
4 : strong impact
Does the action contribute to improving the quality control of norms and standards relating to disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation?
3 : moderate contribution
Please evaluate the action's contribution in reducing incoherence between existing legal, normative and contractual references in the field of disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation, including between different countries
4 : strong contribution
What is the action's contribution towards reducing incoherencies in the management of different natural hazards in view of an evolution towards a multi-hazard approach?
5 : very strong contribution
How does the action contribute towards integrating civil society and local business/private sector in decision making processes?
4 : strong contribution
Investment for increasing resilience (Average : 4.5)
What is the action's contribution to ensure the funding of new initiatives and equipment (retrofit of critical infrastructure, building of laboratories, implementation of outreach programmes...)?
5 : very strong contribution
How would you describe the action's impact on promoting public and private actors' self-investment in preventing and reducing disaster risk or adapting to climate change?
4 : strong impact
Please evaluate the action's contribution to risk sharing/transfer via appropriate financial instruments (insurance, etc.)
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
How does the action contribute to economic development (innovation, new markets, job creation)?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Please evaluate the action's contribution to reducing social vulnerability by decreasing poverty and developing social safety nets
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Disadvantaged and/or socially isolated groups (children/senior citizens/people with disabilities, racial/sexual/religious minorities) have specific needs in terms of risk prevention. Does the action account for these needs?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Improvement of response (Average : 2.6)
Does the action contribute to establishing or improving early warning systems, including via the implementation of crisis simulation exercices?
0 : no contribution
Does the action contribute to better identifying and quantifying the impacts of natural hazards, particularly long term effects?
5 : very strong contribution
Does the action contribute to creating opportunities for reducing vulnerability during the post-disaster reconstruction phase? (Build Back Better)
4 : strong contribution
Please evaluate the action's contribution to facilitating emergency response and population evacuation in the event of a crisis
0 : no contribution
Please evaluate the action's impact on the timespan needed for the restoration of critical facilities and services (transportation, healthcare, energy...)
4 : strong impact
Potential for transformative change (Average : 1)
Does the action enhance political will to act on disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation?
4 : strong impact
Please evaluate the action's contribution to promote local population's involvement in disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation activities
0 : no contribution
Does the action account for environmental sustainability (respect and preservation of natural landscape, biodiversity, ecosystems, soil and water quality...)?
0 : no particular consideration
Chapter 1: From Disaster Risk Management to Disaster Risk Governance : 4
Please evaluate the action's contribution in reducing incoherence between existing legal, normative and contractual references in the field of disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation, including between different countries
4 : strong contribution
Does the action contribute to integrating scientific research into public policy or decision making process?
4 : strong contribution
Does the action contribute to creating opportunities for reducing vulnerability during the post-disaster reconstruction phase? (Build Back Better)
4 : strong contribution
Chapter 2: Sharing Knowledge : 4.33
Is the action able to federate different fields of expertise?
4 : strong ability
Does the action contribute to integrating scientific research into public policy or decision making process?
4 : strong contribution
Does the action contribute to create, enrich or improve data contents?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Does the action contribute to better identifying and quantifying the impacts of natural hazards, particularly long term effects?
5 : very strong contribution
Chapter 3: Harmonizing Capacities : 1.5
Does the action contribute to improving the quality control of norms and standards relating to disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation?
3 : moderate contribution
Does the action contribute to establishing or improving early warning systems, including via the implementation of crisis simulation exercices?
0 : no contribution
Chapter 4: Institutionalizing Coordination : 4.5
Please evaluate the action's impact on improving the coordinated cooperation between various institutions/organizations from DRR and CCA?
4 : strong impact
What is the action's contribution towards reducing incoherencies in the management of different natural hazards in view of an evolution towards a multi-hazard approach?
5 : very strong contribution
Chapter 5: Engaging Stakeholders : 2.67
How does the action contribute towards integrating civil society and local business/private sector in decision making processes?
4 : strong contribution
How would you describe the action's impact on promoting public and private actors' self-investment in preventing and reducing disaster risk or adapting to climate change?
4 : strong impact
Please evaluate the action's contribution to promote local population's involvement in disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation activities
0 : no contribution
Chapter 6: Leveraging Political Commitment : 4.5
Does the action enhance political will to act on disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation?
4 : strong impact
What is the action's contribution to ensure the funding of new initiatives and equipment (retrofit of critical infrastructure, building of laboratories, implementation of outreach programmes...)?
5 : very strong contribution
Please evaluate the action's contribution to risk sharing/transfer via appropriate financial instruments (insurance, etc.)
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Chapter 7: Developing Communication : 3
Please evaluate the action's influence on transparency and public access to non-sensitive natural risk and/or climate change data
5 : very strong impact
Does the action have an impact on local risk culture or risk memory among the population?
4 : strong impact
Action's evaluation