La résilience mise à l'épreuve du terrain

Participant’s information
Family name/first name
Quenault Béatrice
Host institution during the project
ESO Rennes UMR 6590
Area of expertise / professional role / SIM code
Science
Please specify
Universities / research institutes
Date of the questionnaire entry
04/04/2017
Source of your information
Scientific publication
Basic information about the action
Title of the action
La résilience mise à l'épreuve du terrain
Are you evaluating an action in its entirety or only a specific sub-section?
Specific part
Please specify
Partie dans une recherche inédite dans le cadre d'une abilitation à poursuivre des recherches
Starting date (real or provisional)
No foreseeable starting date
End date (real or provisional)
No end date specified
Espresso's Challenge concerned
Policy-Science
Thematic context of the action
Governance/public infrastructure
Scientific research/data acquisition
Policy/legislation/regulation
Description of the action
A partir d'entretien des acteurs locaux et des services déconcentrés de l'état, évaluation des politiques publiques
State of progress of the action
Completed
Territories concerned by the action
France
Spatial scale of the action
Municipal scale
Type(s) of hazards concerned by the action
Storm surge/coastal inundation
In which language(s) have the action-related documents been formulated?
French
Risk evaluation and understanding (Average : 2.8)
Does the action have an impact on the fundamental scientific understanding of natural risks and/or climate change?
5 : Yes
Please evaluate the action's influence on transparency and public access to non-sensitive natural risk and/or climate change data
0 : no particular impact
Is the action able to federate different fields of expertise?
4 : strong ability
Does the action contribute to create, enrich or improve data contents?
0 : no contribution
Does the action have an impact on local risk culture or risk memory among the population?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Does the action integrate local and indigenous knowledge?
5 : Local knowledge fully integrated
Optimising governance (Average : 1.17)
Does the action contribute to integrating scientific research into public policy or decision making process?
4 : strong contribution
Please evaluate the action's impact on improving the coordinated cooperation between various institutions/organizations from DRR and CCA?
0 : no impact
Does the action contribute to improving the quality control of norms and standards relating to disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation?
0 : no contribution
Please evaluate the action's contribution in reducing incoherence between existing legal, normative and contractual references in the field of disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation, including between different countries
0 : no contribution
What is the action's contribution towards reducing incoherencies in the management of different natural hazards in view of an evolution towards a multi-hazard approach?
0 : no contribution
How does the action contribute towards integrating civil society and local business/private sector in decision making processes?
3 : moderate contribution
Investment for increasing resilience (Average : 1.17)
What is the action's contribution to ensure the funding of new initiatives and equipment (retrofit of critical infrastructure, building of laboratories, implementation of outreach programmes...)?
4 : strong contribution
How would you describe the action's impact on promoting public and private actors' self-investment in preventing and reducing disaster risk or adapting to climate change?
0 : no impact
Please evaluate the action's contribution to risk sharing/transfer via appropriate financial instruments (insurance, etc.)
0 : no contribution
How does the action contribute to economic development (innovation, new markets, job creation)?
0 : no impact
Please evaluate the action's contribution to reducing social vulnerability by decreasing poverty and developing social safety nets
0 : no contribution
Disadvantaged and/or socially isolated groups (children/senior citizens/people with disabilities, racial/sexual/religious minorities) have specific needs in terms of risk prevention. Does the action account for these needs?
3 : The needs of at least one of these groups are explicitly addressed in the action
Improvement of response (Average : 0.8)
Does the action contribute to establishing or improving early warning systems, including via the implementation of crisis simulation exercices?
0 : no contribution
Does the action contribute to better identifying and quantifying the impacts of natural hazards, particularly long term effects?
0 : no contribution
Does the action contribute to creating opportunities for reducing vulnerability during the post-disaster reconstruction phase? (Build Back Better)
4 : strong contribution
Please evaluate the action's contribution to facilitating emergency response and population evacuation in the event of a crisis
0 : no contribution
Please evaluate the action's impact on the timespan needed for the restoration of critical facilities and services (transportation, healthcare, energy...)
0 : no impact
Potential for transformative change (Average : 1.71)
Does the action enhance political will to act on disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation?
3 : moderate impact
Please evaluate the action's contribution to promote local population's involvement in disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation activities
0 : no contribution
Is the action sustainable from an economic point of view (e.g. maintenance costs)?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Does the action account for environmental sustainability (respect and preservation of natural landscape, biodiversity, ecosystems, soil and water quality...)?
0 : no particular consideration
Does the action explicitly take into account climate change issues?
5 : Yes
Is the action transferable to a different territorial, national or cultural context?
2 : Difficult to transpose
Is the action transferable to a different spatial or temporal scale?
2 : Difficult to transpose
Chapter 1: From Disaster Risk Management to Disaster Risk Governance : 2.67
Please evaluate the action's contribution in reducing incoherence between existing legal, normative and contractual references in the field of disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation, including between different countries
0 : no contribution
Does the action contribute to integrating scientific research into public policy or decision making process?
4 : strong contribution
Does the action contribute to creating opportunities for reducing vulnerability during the post-disaster reconstruction phase? (Build Back Better)
4 : strong contribution
Chapter 2: Sharing Knowledge : 3
Is the action able to federate different fields of expertise?
4 : strong ability
Does the action contribute to integrating scientific research into public policy or decision making process?
4 : strong contribution
Does the action integrate local and indigenous knowledge?
5 : Local knowledge fully integrated
Does the action have an impact on the fundamental scientific understanding of natural risks and/or climate change?
5 : Yes
Does the action contribute to create, enrich or improve data contents?
0 : no contribution
Does the action contribute to better identifying and quantifying the impacts of natural hazards, particularly long term effects?
0 : no contribution
Chapter 3: Harmonizing Capacities
Does the action contribute to improving the quality control of norms and standards relating to disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation?
0 : no contribution
Does the action contribute to establishing or improving early warning systems, including via the implementation of crisis simulation exercices?
0 : no contribution
Chapter 4: Institutionalizing Coordination
Please evaluate the action's impact on improving the coordinated cooperation between various institutions/organizations from DRR and CCA?
0 : no impact
What is the action's contribution towards reducing incoherencies in the management of different natural hazards in view of an evolution towards a multi-hazard approach?
0 : no contribution
Chapter 5: Engaging Stakeholders : 2
How does the action contribute towards integrating civil society and local business/private sector in decision making processes?
3 : moderate contribution
Does the action integrate local and indigenous knowledge?
5 : Local knowledge fully integrated
How would you describe the action's impact on promoting public and private actors' self-investment in preventing and reducing disaster risk or adapting to climate change?
0 : no impact
Please evaluate the action's contribution to promote local population's involvement in disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation activities
0 : no contribution
Is the action transferable to a different territorial, national or cultural context?
2 : Difficult to transpose
Is the action transferable to a different spatial or temporal scale?
2 : Difficult to transpose
Chapter 6: Leveraging Political Commitment : 2.33
Does the action enhance political will to act on disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation?
3 : moderate impact
What is the action's contribution to ensure the funding of new initiatives and equipment (retrofit of critical infrastructure, building of laboratories, implementation of outreach programmes...)?
4 : strong contribution
Please evaluate the action's contribution to risk sharing/transfer via appropriate financial instruments (insurance, etc.)
0 : no contribution
Is the action sustainable from an economic point of view (e.g. maintenance costs)?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Chapter 7: Developing Communication
Please evaluate the action's influence on transparency and public access to non-sensitive natural risk and/or climate change data
0 : no particular impact
Does the action have an impact on local risk culture or risk memory among the population?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Action's evaluation