Surveillance de l'activité éruptive explosive par l'analyse morphologique des particules de cendres

Participant’s information
Family name/first name
Leibrandt Sébastien
Email address
Host institution during the project
Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans
Area of expertise / professional role / SIM code
Science
Please specify
Universities / research institutes
Level of involvement in the action
Direct involvement
Date of the questionnaire entry
07/04/2017
Source of your information
Professional experience
Basic information about the action
Title of the action
Surveillance de l'activité éruptive explosive par l'analyse morphologique des particules de cendres
Are you evaluating an action in its entirety or only a specific sub-section?
Specific part
Please specify
Amélioration de la prévention des risques volcaniques
Starting date (real or provisional)
No foreseeable starting date
End date (real or provisional)
No end date specified
Espresso's Challenge concerned
Disaster Risk Reduction
Thematic context of the action
Scientific research/data acquisition
Description of the action
Développement d'une méthode rapide et en routine de l'analyse de la morphologie des particules de cendre pour déterminer un dynamisme éruptif dans le but de créer un outil de surveillance des éruptions explosives.
State of progress of the action
Completed
Territories concerned by the action
Other
Please specify
Plusieurs pays
Spatial scale of the action
World scale
Type(s) of hazards concerned by the action
Volcanic eruption
In which language(s) have the action-related documents been formulated?
English
French
Risk evaluation and understanding (Average : 3.83)
Does the action have an impact on the fundamental scientific understanding of natural risks and/or climate change?
5 : Yes
Please evaluate the action's influence on transparency and public access to non-sensitive natural risk and/or climate change data
0 : no particular impact
Is the action able to federate different fields of expertise?
4 : strong ability
Does the action contribute to create, enrich or improve data contents?
5 : very strong contribution
Does the action have an impact on local risk culture or risk memory among the population?
4 : strong impact
Does the action integrate local and indigenous knowledge?
5 : Local knowledge fully integrated
Optimising governance (Average : 2)
Does the action contribute to integrating scientific research into public policy or decision making process?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Please evaluate the action's impact on improving the coordinated cooperation between various institutions/organizations from DRR and CCA?
4 : strong impact
Does the action contribute to improving the quality control of norms and standards relating to disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Please evaluate the action's contribution in reducing incoherence between existing legal, normative and contractual references in the field of disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation, including between different countries
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
What is the action's contribution towards reducing incoherencies in the management of different natural hazards in view of an evolution towards a multi-hazard approach?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
How does the action contribute towards integrating civil society and local business/private sector in decision making processes?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Does the action contribute to building or maintaining the expertise, knowledge and/or skills among public bodies?
0 : no contribution
Investment for increasing resilience (Average : 1)
What is the action's contribution to ensure the funding of new initiatives and equipment (retrofit of critical infrastructure, building of laboratories, implementation of outreach programmes...)?
2 : limited contribution
How would you describe the action's impact on promoting public and private actors' self-investment in preventing and reducing disaster risk or adapting to climate change?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Please evaluate the action's contribution to risk sharing/transfer via appropriate financial instruments (insurance, etc.)
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
How does the action contribute to economic development (innovation, new markets, job creation)?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Please evaluate the action's contribution to reducing social vulnerability by decreasing poverty and developing social safety nets
0 : no contribution
Disadvantaged and/or socially isolated groups (children/senior citizens/people with disabilities, racial/sexual/religious minorities) have specific needs in terms of risk prevention. Does the action account for these needs?
1 : These needs were not considered in the action
Improvement of response (Average : 3.67)
Does the action contribute to establishing or improving early warning systems, including via the implementation of crisis simulation exercices?
3 : moderate contribution
Does the action contribute to better identifying and quantifying the impacts of natural hazards, particularly long term effects?
4 : strong contribution
Does the action contribute to creating opportunities for reducing vulnerability during the post-disaster reconstruction phase? (Build Back Better)
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Please evaluate the action's contribution to facilitating emergency response and population evacuation in the event of a crisis
4 : strong contribution
Please evaluate the action's impact on the timespan needed for the restoration of critical facilities and services (transportation, healthcare, energy...)
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Potential for transformative change (Average : 1.29)
Does the action enhance political will to act on disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation?
0 : no impact
Please evaluate the action's contribution to promote local population's involvement in disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation activities
I do not know or I don't wish to answer
Is the action sustainable from an economic point of view (e.g. maintenance costs)?
0 : Further financing required in order to ensure sustainability
Does the action account for environmental sustainability (respect and preservation of natural landscape, biodiversity, ecosystems, soil and water quality...)?
0 : no particular consideration
Does the action explicitly take into account climate change issues?
0 : No
Is the action transferable to a different territorial, national or cultural context?
3 : Easily transferable
Is the action transferable to a different spatial or temporal scale?
3 : Easily transferable
Chapter 1: From Disaster Risk Management to Disaster Risk Governance
Please evaluate the action's contribution in reducing incoherence between existing legal, normative and contractual references in the field of disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation, including between different countries
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Does the action contribute to integrating scientific research into public policy or decision making process?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Does the action contribute to creating opportunities for reducing vulnerability during the post-disaster reconstruction phase? (Build Back Better)
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Chapter 2: Sharing Knowledge : 4.6
Is the action able to federate different fields of expertise?
4 : strong ability
Does the action contribute to integrating scientific research into public policy or decision making process?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Does the action integrate local and indigenous knowledge?
5 : Local knowledge fully integrated
Does the action have an impact on the fundamental scientific understanding of natural risks and/or climate change?
5 : Yes
Does the action contribute to create, enrich or improve data contents?
5 : very strong contribution
Does the action contribute to better identifying and quantifying the impacts of natural hazards, particularly long term effects?
4 : strong contribution
Chapter 3: Harmonizing Capacities : 1.5
Does the action contribute to building or maintaining the expertise, knowledge and/or skills among public bodies?
0 : no contribution
Does the action contribute to improving the quality control of norms and standards relating to disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Does the action contribute to establishing or improving early warning systems, including via the implementation of crisis simulation exercices?
3 : moderate contribution
Chapter 4: Institutionalizing Coordination : 4
Please evaluate the action's impact on improving the coordinated cooperation between various institutions/organizations from DRR and CCA?
4 : strong impact
What is the action's contribution towards reducing incoherencies in the management of different natural hazards in view of an evolution towards a multi-hazard approach?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Chapter 5: Engaging Stakeholders : 3.67
How does the action contribute towards integrating civil society and local business/private sector in decision making processes?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Does the action integrate local and indigenous knowledge?
5 : Local knowledge fully integrated
How would you describe the action's impact on promoting public and private actors' self-investment in preventing and reducing disaster risk or adapting to climate change?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Please evaluate the action's contribution to promote local population's involvement in disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation activities
I do not know or I don't wish to answer
Is the action transferable to a different territorial, national or cultural context?
3 : Easily transferable
Is the action transferable to a different spatial or temporal scale?
3 : Easily transferable
Chapter 6: Leveraging Political Commitment : 0.67
Does the action enhance political will to act on disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation?
0 : no impact
What is the action's contribution to ensure the funding of new initiatives and equipment (retrofit of critical infrastructure, building of laboratories, implementation of outreach programmes...)?
2 : limited contribution
Please evaluate the action's contribution to risk sharing/transfer via appropriate financial instruments (insurance, etc.)
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Is the action sustainable from an economic point of view (e.g. maintenance costs)?
0 : Further financing required in order to ensure sustainability
Chapter 7: Developing Communication : 2.33
Please evaluate the action's influence on transparency and public access to non-sensitive natural risk and/or climate change data
0 : no particular impact
Does the action have an impact on local risk culture or risk memory among the population?
4 : strong impact
Action's evaluation