Plan Adaptation Changement Climatique - "Erosion côtière" Nouvelle Aquitaine

Participant’s information
Family name/first name
MASPATAUD Aurélie
Email address
a.maspataud@brgm.fr
Host institution during the project
BRGM
Area of expertise / professional role / SIM code
Science
Please specify
Universities / research institutes
Level of involvement in the action
External observer
Date of the questionnaire entry
06/04/2017
Source of your information
Professional experience
Basic information about the action
Title of the action
Plan Adaptation Changement Climatique - "Erosion côtière" Nouvelle Aquitaine
Acronym of the action
PACC - Aquit
Are you evaluating an action in its entirety or only a specific sub-section?
Entire action
Espresso's Challenge concerned
Climate Change Adaptation
Thematic context of the action
Scientific research/data acquisition
Policy/legislation/regulation
Description of the action
Les attentes du projet concernent des projections de l'évolution du trait de côte dans un contexte de changement climatique, intégrant la prise en compte des différents facteurs physiques en jeu dans l'élévation du niveau de la mer. L'application des résu
State of progress of the action
Ongoing
Territories concerned by the action
France
Spatial scale of the action
Regional scale
Type(s) of hazards concerned by the action
Storm surge/coastal inundation
In which language(s) have the action-related documents been formulated?
French
Risk evaluation and understanding (Average : 4.33)
Does the action have an impact on the fundamental scientific understanding of natural risks and/or climate change?
5 : Yes
Please evaluate the action's influence on transparency and public access to non-sensitive natural risk and/or climate change data
4 : strong impact
Is the action able to federate different fields of expertise?
3 : moderate ability
Does the action contribute to create, enrich or improve data contents?
5 : very strong contribution
Does the action have an impact on local risk culture or risk memory among the population?
4 : strong impact
Does the action integrate local and indigenous knowledge?
5 : Local knowledge fully integrated
Optimising governance (Average : 3.4)
Does the action contribute to integrating scientific research into public policy or decision making process?
4 : strong contribution
Please evaluate the action's impact on improving the coordinated cooperation between various institutions/organizations from DRR and CCA?
5 : very strong impact
Does the action contribute to improving the quality control of norms and standards relating to disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation?
2 : limited contribution
Please evaluate the action's contribution in reducing incoherence between existing legal, normative and contractual references in the field of disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation, including between different countries
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
What is the action's contribution towards reducing incoherencies in the management of different natural hazards in view of an evolution towards a multi-hazard approach?
4 : strong contribution
How does the action contribute towards integrating civil society and local business/private sector in decision making processes?
2 : limited contribution
Investment for increasing resilience (Average : 2.25)
What is the action's contribution to ensure the funding of new initiatives and equipment (retrofit of critical infrastructure, building of laboratories, implementation of outreach programmes...)?
4 : strong contribution
How would you describe the action's impact on promoting public and private actors' self-investment in preventing and reducing disaster risk or adapting to climate change?
3 : moderate impact
Please evaluate the action's contribution to risk sharing/transfer via appropriate financial instruments (insurance, etc.)
2 : limited contribution
How does the action contribute to economic development (innovation, new markets, job creation)?
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Please evaluate the action's contribution to reducing social vulnerability by decreasing poverty and developing social safety nets
0 : no contribution
Improvement of response (Average : 1.25)
Does the action contribute to establishing or improving early warning systems, including via the implementation of crisis simulation exercices?
0 : no contribution
Does the action contribute to better identifying and quantifying the impacts of natural hazards, particularly long term effects?
5 : very strong contribution
Does the action contribute to creating opportunities for reducing vulnerability during the post-disaster reconstruction phase? (Build Back Better)
0 : no contribution
Please evaluate the action's contribution to facilitating emergency response and population evacuation in the event of a crisis
0 : no contribution
Please evaluate the action's impact on the timespan needed for the restoration of critical facilities and services (transportation, healthcare, energy...)
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Potential for transformative change (Average : 3.25)
Does the action enhance political will to act on disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation?
5 : very strong impact
Please evaluate the action's contribution to promote local population's involvement in disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation activities
4 : strong contribution
Is the action sustainable from an economic point of view (e.g. maintenance costs)?
2 : Barely sustainable
Does the action account for environmental sustainability (respect and preservation of natural landscape, biodiversity, ecosystems, soil and water quality...)?
4 : fairly comprehensive consideration
Does the action explicitly take into account climate change issues?
5 : Yes
Is the action transferable to a different territorial, national or cultural context?
3 : Easily transferable
Is the action transferable to a different spatial or temporal scale?
3 : Easily transferable
Chapter 1: From Disaster Risk Management to Disaster Risk Governance : 2
Please evaluate the action's contribution in reducing incoherence between existing legal, normative and contractual references in the field of disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation, including between different countries
I do not know or I do not wish to answer
Does the action contribute to integrating scientific research into public policy or decision making process?
4 : strong contribution
Does the action contribute to creating opportunities for reducing vulnerability during the post-disaster reconstruction phase? (Build Back Better)
0 : no contribution
Chapter 2: Sharing Knowledge : 4.5
Is the action able to federate different fields of expertise?
3 : moderate ability
Does the action contribute to integrating scientific research into public policy or decision making process?
4 : strong contribution
Does the action integrate local and indigenous knowledge?
5 : Local knowledge fully integrated
Does the action have an impact on the fundamental scientific understanding of natural risks and/or climate change?
5 : Yes
Does the action contribute to create, enrich or improve data contents?
5 : very strong contribution
Does the action contribute to better identifying and quantifying the impacts of natural hazards, particularly long term effects?
5 : very strong contribution
Chapter 3: Harmonizing Capacities : 1
Does the action contribute to improving the quality control of norms and standards relating to disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation?
2 : limited contribution
Does the action contribute to establishing or improving early warning systems, including via the implementation of crisis simulation exercices?
0 : no contribution
Chapter 4: Institutionalizing Coordination : 4.5
Please evaluate the action's impact on improving the coordinated cooperation between various institutions/organizations from DRR and CCA?
5 : very strong impact
What is the action's contribution towards reducing incoherencies in the management of different natural hazards in view of an evolution towards a multi-hazard approach?
4 : strong contribution
Chapter 5: Engaging Stakeholders : 3.33
How does the action contribute towards integrating civil society and local business/private sector in decision making processes?
2 : limited contribution
Does the action integrate local and indigenous knowledge?
5 : Local knowledge fully integrated
How would you describe the action's impact on promoting public and private actors' self-investment in preventing and reducing disaster risk or adapting to climate change?
3 : moderate impact
Please evaluate the action's contribution to promote local population's involvement in disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation activities
4 : strong contribution
Is the action transferable to a different territorial, national or cultural context?
3 : Easily transferable
Is the action transferable to a different spatial or temporal scale?
3 : Easily transferable
Chapter 6: Leveraging Political Commitment : 3.25
Does the action enhance political will to act on disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation?
5 : very strong impact
What is the action's contribution to ensure the funding of new initiatives and equipment (retrofit of critical infrastructure, building of laboratories, implementation of outreach programmes...)?
4 : strong contribution
Please evaluate the action's contribution to risk sharing/transfer via appropriate financial instruments (insurance, etc.)
2 : limited contribution
Is the action sustainable from an economic point of view (e.g. maintenance costs)?
2 : Barely sustainable
Chapter 7: Developing Communication : 2.67
Please evaluate the action's influence on transparency and public access to non-sensitive natural risk and/or climate change data
4 : strong impact
Does the action have an impact on local risk culture or risk memory among the population?
4 : strong impact
Action's evaluation